A Case Study for a Business Organization

A Case Study for a Business Organization Betty can operate her business in various ways, which include a franchise, a sole proprietorship, a corporation, a limited liability company and a partnership. To start with, a limited liability (LLC) company is a business enterprise, which blends the characteristics of a partnership and a sole proprietorship.Advertising We will write a custom case study sample on A Case Study for a Business Organization specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This entity gives a limited liability to the shareholders of the company. In which case, if a business goes under during its existence, one can only sue the business as an entity without affecting the legal entity of the individual shareholders. This goes off as a major advantage for this entity (Harold 1983). On the other hand, when two or more people come together to operate a business, they form a partnership. At start up, or during the operation of the business, each partner contributes an agreed s hare of the resources required to run the business. This can be in terms of labor, money, land, and at the end gains a reward depending on an agreed formula. Under the current US laws, a partnership does not pay income tax. However, the shareholders of this entity must file their respective shares of the entity’s profits and losses in their individual tax returns (Cooke 1950). On its part, a corporation is a legal entity incorporated through registration and with legal rights and liabilities. Corporations are on their own, entities with a board of directors heading them. The other business form, which Betty can undertake, is a franchise. In this business form, a franchisor allows the franchisee to use his trademark and distribute the trademarked goods or services (Cooke 1950). For a start up business as Betty is intending to operate, a franchise is the most appropriate model to adopt. Here, Betty gets an already established brand name, which would help her a great deal in min imizing losses during the break-even period. As well, almost all franchisors provide business training and technical knowhow to their franchisees. She would access the much-needed knowhow for her startup venture (Gurnick 2011). It would be necessary for Betty to join hands with other interested investors to operate the business. One of the interested investors is her husband only wants to contribute capital to the business. Another interested person is Erma a non-Christian. Erma, though not Christian, shares Betty’s vision of a â€Å"Christian coffee place†, and would provide an invaluable contribution to the business. It is important to point out that the vision of any organization is what drives it and as such, Erma would come in as an essential stakeholder in this venture.Advertising Looking for case study on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More On the other hand, Betty’s siste r, Alice comes off as dispassionate and does not identify with the venture’s mission. She lacks the energy that would contribute to the success of the business. It would be suicidal for Betty to accept her solely on the reason that she wants to get out of the house. Betty should explain these reasons to her sister. The name â€Å"The Gathering Place† is most appropriate for the coffeehouse. However, a search at the State of North Carolina’s registry reveals that the name is already in use by a nonprofit organization. For that reason, it would be illegal for her to use the name for trade marking purposes. However, most franchisors already have an established brand name. Betty could choose to use the franchisor’s name for her coffeehouse instead of dwelling on choosing a new one. References Cooke, C.A. (1950). Corporation, Trust and Company: A legal History. New York: Oxford University Press. Gurnick, D. T. (2011). Distribution law of the United States. U.S .: Juris. Harold, J. B. (1983). The Impact of Limited Liability and Control. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

Free Essays on Algerias Colonialism

Before discussing the experience of colonization of French in Algeria, it is necessary to give a definition of the term â€Å"Colonialism† as used in the following context. According to the Dictionary of Social Sciences, the term represents â€Å"the system of political and economic administration whereby a dominant country controls and exploits the resources of dominated peoples, who are often of a different culture.† Likewise, in the Dictionary of Critical Social Sciences, a colony is defined as â€Å"a poor or weak country that is occupied by the military and/or police forces of a more powerful country.† It seems that French control of Algeria definitely meets the dictionary definition of colonialism. Back in early African history, Europeans colonized and infiltrated African civilizations in order to make a profit and to be known as a superior nation. By doing this, European colonists changed and transformed the traditional African lifestyle. African’s were willing to let the colonists join them, but the Europeans went too far when they took over governments and tried to rule over the Africans. This colonization led to many problems in Africa that still affect modern day Africa. According to the European Colonization map, it shows that France and Great Britain ruled most of the Northern Part of Africa. There were two ways to rule colonies; direct rule (French) and indirect rule (Great Britain). The difference between these two different types of governing was that indirect rule was when a local chief or leader ruled the colony, but was used as just a messenger from a higher power of authority, in this case, the British. The British would make the laws for the ruler to enforce, and he would do it. In the case of direct rule, the country that colonized the country, ruled it. The French ruled their colonies in Africa and enforced their own rules, rather than let a local leader do it. And a good example of this is Algeria. In ... Free Essays on Algeria's Colonialism Free Essays on Algeria's Colonialism Before discussing the experience of colonization of French in Algeria, it is necessary to give a definition of the term â€Å"Colonialism† as used in the following context. According to the Dictionary of Social Sciences, the term represents â€Å"the system of political and economic administration whereby a dominant country controls and exploits the resources of dominated peoples, who are often of a different culture.† Likewise, in the Dictionary of Critical Social Sciences, a colony is defined as â€Å"a poor or weak country that is occupied by the military and/or police forces of a more powerful country.† It seems that French control of Algeria definitely meets the dictionary definition of colonialism. Back in early African history, Europeans colonized and infiltrated African civilizations in order to make a profit and to be known as a superior nation. By doing this, European colonists changed and transformed the traditional African lifestyle. African’s were willing to let the colonists join them, but the Europeans went too far when they took over governments and tried to rule over the Africans. This colonization led to many problems in Africa that still affect modern day Africa. According to the European Colonization map, it shows that France and Great Britain ruled most of the Northern Part of Africa. There were two ways to rule colonies; direct rule (French) and indirect rule (Great Britain). The difference between these two different types of governing was that indirect rule was when a local chief or leader ruled the colony, but was used as just a messenger from a higher power of authority, in this case, the British. The British would make the laws for the ruler to enforce, and he would do it. In the case of direct rule, the country that colonized the country, ruled it. The French ruled their colonies in Africa and enforced their own rules, rather than let a local leader do it. And a good example of this is Algeria. In ...